Nginx vs Traefik vs Caddy: Which Reverse Proxy to Choose?

Choosing the right Reverse Proxy is one of the first and most important decisions when building a Homelab or setting up a production infrastructure. It is the gateway to your services, responsible for routing, SSL termination, and security.

For years, Nginx has been the undisputed king. But recently, “Cloud Native” options like Traefik and modern simplifiers like Caddy have gained massive popularity.

In this post, we will compare these three giants to help you decide which one is best for your use case.

1. Nginx: The Robust Veteran

Nginx (pronounced “engine-x”) is the most popular web server in the world. It is battle-tested, extremely performant, and flexible.

✅ Pros

❌ Cons

Best for: Production environments where performance is critical, or when you need advanced features like caching and complex rewriting rules.


2. Traefik: The Cloud-Native Hero

Traefik was born in the container era. It is designed to work dynamically with Docker, Kubernetes, and other orchestrators.

✅ Pros

❌ Cons

Best for: Docker and Kubernetes environments. If you spin up containers frequently, Traefik is a no-brainer.


3. Caddy: The Modern Simplifier

Caddy is the web server that aims to be the easiest to use. Its motto is “HTTPS by default”.

✅ Pros

❌ Cons

Best for: Quick setups, simple sites, and users who want “it just works” HTTPS without headaches.


Comparison Summary

FeatureNginxTraefikCaddy
ConfigurationVerbose (Conf)YAML / LabelsConcise (Caddyfile)
SSL (Let’s Encrypt)Manual (Certbot)AutomaticAutomatic (Default)
Docker IntegrationManual (or via proxy-gen)Excellent (Native)Good (via Module)
ObservabilityGood (Logs/Stub Status)Excellent (Metrics/Tracing)Good (Built-in)
ExtensibilityHard (C Modules/Lua)Medium (Go Plugins)Easy (Go Modules)
Performance🚀 HighestHighHigh
Learning CurveMedium/HighMediumLow

Verdict: Which one should you choose?

In my personal Homelab, although I have experimented with all of them, I currently use Nginx configured as an API Gateway.

Why? Because my core infrastructure runs on Kubernetes, and by adopting the Gateway API pattern, I actually don’t need a traditional Ingress Controller anymore. The API Gateway handles routing, authentication, and complex traffic management in a much more flexible way than the standard Ingress resource.

Speaking of which, is the API Gateway pattern the successor to the traditional Ingress? That is a topic for our next post!

Check out my latest video where I talk about another major migration in my Homelab:

There is no wrong choice, only the right tool for the job!

Advertisement

Comments

Start searching

Enter keywords to search articles

↑↓
ESC
⌘K Shortcut